Print version

Research

CWSA Publications

Below is a list of CWSA unclassified publications, ordered by year.

Forthcoming | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998

 

Forthcoming

Naikar, N. (in press). Work domain analysis: Concepts, guidelines, and cases. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

2010

Naikar, N. (2010).  A comparison of the decision ladder template and the recognition-primed decision model. DSTO Technical Report (DSTO-TR-2397). Fishermans Bend, Australia: Air Operations Division. (attachment available on right.)

2009

Branford, K., Naikar, N., & Hopkins, A. (2009). Guidelines for AcciMap analysis. In A. Hopkins (Ed.), Learning from high reliability organisations (pp. 193-212). Sydney, Australia: CCH Australia.

2008

Naikar, N. (2008). Beyond the design of ecological interfaces: Applications of work domain analysis and control task analysis to the evaluation of design proposals, team design and training. In A. Bisantz & C. Burns (Eds.), Applications of cognitive work analysis (pp. 69-94). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

Baker, C., Naikar, N., & Neerincx, M. (2008). Engineering planetary exploration systems: Integrating novel technologies and the human element using work domain analysis. Proceedings of the 59th International Astronautical Congress 2008: Symposium on Stepping Stones to the Future: Strategies, Architectures, Concepts and Technologies (D3). Glasgow, Scotland: International Astronautical Federation. (attachment available on right)

Elix, B., & Naikar, N. (2008). Designing safe and effective future systems: A new approach for modelling decisions in future systems with cognitive work analysis. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium of the Australian Aviation Psychology Association. Sydney, Australia: Australian Aviation Psychology Association. (attachment available on right)

2007

Crone, D., Sanderson, P., & Naikar, N. (2007). Studying complex human-system behaviour: Human-in-the-loop simulation requirements. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 1603-1607). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. (attachment available on right)

Crone, D., Sanderson, P., Naikar, N., & Parker, S. (2007). Selecting sensitive measures of performance in complex multivariable environments. Proceedings of the 2007 Simulation Technology Conference (SimTecT 2007). Lindfield, Australia: Simulation Industry Association of Australia. (attachment available on right)

Branford, K. (2007). An investigation into the validity and reliability of the AcciMap approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.

2006

Naikar, N. (2006). An examination of the key concepts of the five phases of cognitive work analysis with examples from a familiar system. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 447-451). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. (attachment available on right)

Naikar, N. (2006). Beyond interface design: Further applications of cognitive work analysis. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36, 423-438. (attachment available on right)

Naikar, N., Moylan, A., & Pearce, B. (2006). Analysing activity in complex systems with cognitive work analysis: Concepts, guidelines and case study for control task analysis. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 7(4), 371-394. (attachment available on right)

Baker, C. (2006). Evaluation and refinement of a methodological approach to work domain analysis. Unpublished Honours Thesis, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.

2005

Naikar, N. (2005). A methodology for work domain analysis, the first phase of cognitive work analysis. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 312-316). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Naikar, N. (2005). Theoretical concepts for work domain analysis, the first phase of cognitive work analysis. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 249-253). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Naikar, N., Hopcroft, R., & Moylan, A. (2005). Work domain analysis: Theoretical concepts and methodology. DSTO Technical Report (DSTO-TR-1665). Fishermans Bend, Australia: Air Operations Division. (attachment available on right)

2004

Lawrie, G., Capon, S., Cutler, P., Filippidis, A., Iob, M., Pearce, B., Priest, T., Rockliff, A., Skinner, M., Temple, P., Tweedale, J., & White, K. (2004). Wedgetail evolution: Soaring to greater heights? Proceedings of the 11th Australian International Aerospace Congress Meeting. Melbourne, Australia: The Institution of Engineers. (attachment available on right)

2003

Crone, D., Sanderson, P., & Naikar, N. (2003). Using cognitive work analysis to develop a capability for the evaluation of future systems. Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 1938-1942). Santa Monica CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. (attachment available on right)

Naikar, N., & Pearce, B. (2003). Analysing activity for future systems. Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 1928-1932). Santa Monica CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. (attachment available on right)

Naikar, N., Pearce, B., Drumm, D., & Sanderson, P. M. (2003). Designing teams for first-of-a-kind, complex systems using the initial phases of cognitive work analysis: Case study. Human Factors, 45(2), 202-217. (attachment available on right)

Naikar, N., & Saunders, A. (2003). Crossing the boundaries of safe operation: A technical training approach to error management. Cognition Technology and Work, 5, 171-180. (attachment available on right)

2002

Lintern, G., & Naikar, N. (2002). A virtual information-action workspace. DSTO Technical Report (DSTO-TR-1356). Edinburgh, Australia: System Sciences Laboratory. (attachment available on right)

Lintern, G., & Naikar, N. (2002). A virtual information-action workspace for command and control. DSTO Technical Report (DSTO-TR-1299). Edinburgh, Australia: System Sciences Laboratory. (attachment available on right)

Naikar, N., Drumm, D., Pearce, B., & Sanderson, P. M. (2002). A formative approach to designing teams for first-of-a-kind, complex systems. Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Human Decision Making and Control (pp. 162-168). Glasgow, Scotland: University of Glasgow.

Naikar, N., & Lintern, G. (2002). A review of "Cognitive Work Analysis: Towards safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work" by Kim J. Vicente. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 12(4), 391-400. (attachment available on right)

Naikar, N., Lintern, G., & Sanderson, P. M. (2002). Cognitive work analysis for air defense applications in Australia. In M. D. McNeese & M. A. Vidulich (Eds.), Cognitive systems engineering in military aviation environments: Avoiding cogminutia fragmentosa! (pp. 169-199). Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH: Human Systems Information Analysis Center. (attachment available on right)

Naikar, N., & Saunders, A. (2002). Crossing the boundaries of safe operation: Training for error detection and error recovery. Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Human Decision Making and Control (pp. 8-15). Glasgow, Scotland: University of Glasgow.

2001

Crone, D. (2001). Analysing the effectiveness of complex human-machine systems: A literature review. DSTO Technical Report. Edinburgh, Australia: System Sciences Laboratory.

Lintern, G., & Naikar, N. (2001). Analysis of crew coordination in the F-111 mission. DSTO Client Report (DSTO-CR-0184). Melbourne, Australia: Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory.

Naikar, N., & Pearce, B. (2001). Analysing activity for new, complex systems with cognitive work analysis. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society of Australia. Sydney, Australia: Ergonomics Society of Australia.

Naikar, N., & Sanderson, P. M. (2001). Evaluating design proposals for complex systems with work domain analysis. Human Factors, 43(4), 529-542. (attachment available on right)

2000

Elliott, G., Crawford, J., Solodilova, I., Sanderson, P., & Naikar, N. (2000). Comparison of adversarial crew cognitive walkthrough and cued recall debrief techniques for eliciting information in a D3M environment. Proceedings of the 2000 Annual Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Group (CHISIG) of the Ergonomics Society of Australia (OzCHI2000) (pp. 72-79). Sydney, Australia: Ergonomics Society of Australia.

Elliott, G., Crawford, J., Watson, M., Sanderson, P. M., & Naikar, N. (2000). Knowledge elicitation techniques for modelling intentional systems with cognitive work analysis. Proceedings of the Fifth Australian Aviation Psychology Symposium. Manly, Australia: Ashgate.

Lintern, G., & Naikar, N. (2000). The use of work domain analysis for the design of training systems. Proceedings of the Joint 14th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (IEA2000/HFES2000) (pp. 198-201). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. (attachment available on right)

Naikar, N., & Sanderson, P.M. (2000). Evaluating design proposals with work domain analysis. Proceedings of the Joint 14th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (IEA2000/HFES2000) (pp. 202-205). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. (attachment available on right)

Naikar, N., Sanderson, P. M., & Lintern, G. (2000). F/A-18 work domain analysis: Identification of training needs for simulator acquisition. DSTO Client Report (DSTO-CR-0117). Melbourne, Australia: Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory.

Sanderson, P. M., & Naikar, N. (2000). Temporal coordination control task analysis for analysing human-system integration. Proceedings of the Joint 14th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (IEA2000/HFES2000) (pp. 206-209). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

1999

Lintern, G., & Naikar, N. (1999). Specification of training simulators by cognitive work analysis. In R. Jensen, B. Cox, J. Callister & R. Lavis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium in Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Department of Aerospace Engineering, Applied Mechanics and Aviation.

Naikar, N., & Sanderson, P. M. (1999). Work domain analysis for training-system definition and acquisition. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9(3), 271-290. (attachment available on right)

Naikar, N., Sanderson, P. M., & Lintern, G. (1999). F/A-18 work domain analysis: Identification of training needs for simulator acquisition. Proceedings of SIMTECT 99 (pp. 65-68). Melbourne, Australia: SimTecT Organising Committee.

Naikar, N., Sanderson, P. M., & Lintern, G. (1999). Work domain analysis for the identification of training needs and training-system design. Proceedings of the 43rd Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Meeting (pp. 1128-1132). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Sanderson, P. M., Naikar, N., Lintern, G., & Goss, S. (1999). Use of cognitive work analysis across the system lifecycle: Requirements to decommissioning. Proceedings of the 43rd Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Meeting (pp. 318-322). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. (attachment available on right)

1998

Lintern, G., & Naikar, N. (1998). Cognitive work analysis for training system design. Proceedings of the Australian/New Zealand conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OzCHI 98) (pp. 252-259). Adelaide, Australia.